A Developmental Comparison of Social Class and Verbal Ability Influences on Piagetian Tasks
- 1 June 1973
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Genetic Psychology
- Vol. 122 (2) , 235-245
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1972.10533149
Abstract
The present investigation attempted to evaluate the respective influences of socioeconomic status and verbal ability levels, as determinants of performance on Piagetian concrete operations tasks. A sample of 160 subjects (kindergarten to fourth grade) were matched on socioeconomic status and verbal ability levels. A battery of Piagetian tasks was administered, including a relational terms pretest, provoked and unprovoked numerical correspondence, unidimensional seriation, height and width, multiple seriation, and conservation of surface area. Results of factorial (grade level × sodoeconomic status × verbal ability × sex) analyses of variance indicated (a) an absence of significant socioeconomic status effects for any of the Piagetian tasks, (6) a significant main effect for the verbal ability and age-grade level factors on the majority of tasks excluding unidimensional height seriation, (c) a general absence of sex main effects or higher order interactions. The lack of difference with regard to socioeconomic-status levels indicates that the previous research which revealed notable socioeconomic-status influences may have had socioeconomic status confounded to varying degrees with differences in underlying verbal skills.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Piagetian Theory and the Aging Process: Extensions and SpeculationsAging and Human Development, 1971
- Experimental inductions of the conservation of "first-order" quantitative invariants.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- Reasons for Failure on the Class Inclusion ProblemChild Development, 1970
- Organization of Data on Life-Span Development of Human AbilitiesPublished by Elsevier ,1970
- Organization of abilities and the development of intelligence.Psychological Review, 1968
- METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEM IN CONSERVATION STUDIES: THE USE OF RELATIONSL TERMSChild Development, 1967
- Note on Conservation: Methodological and Definitional ConsiderationsChild Development, 1966
- Age Differences in Primary Mental Ability FactorsJournal of Gerontology, 1966
- Discrimination, Seriation, and Numeration of Size and Dimensional Differences in Young Children: Piaget Replication Study VIThe Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1964
- The course of cognitive growth.American Psychologist, 1964