Do Attitudes Affect Memory? Tests of the Congeniality Hypothesis
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Vol. 10 (1) , 5-9
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00102
Abstract
Social psychologists have usually hypothesized that attitudinal selectivity biases people's memory in favor of information that is congenial to their attitudes, because they are motivated to defend their attitudes against uncongenial information. However, our meta-analysis found that such effects have been only inconsistently obtained. One reason for these inconsistencies is that the defense of attitudes against attacks does not necessarily entail avoiding the uncongenial information. As shown by our experiments, people often expose themselves to attitudinally uncongenial information, attend to it, scrutinize it carefully, encode it accurately, and remember it fairly well, even though they dislike the information and are not persuaded by it. Given sufficient motivation and capacity, people mount an active defense that enhances memory for the information.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Counterattitudinal Messages Are as Memorable as Proattitudinal Messages: The Importance of Active Defense Against AttackPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000
- The impact of attitudes on memory: An affair to remember.Psychological Bulletin, 1999
- A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996
- Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Attitude and selective learning: Where are the phenomena of yesteryear?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967
- A Theory of Cognitive DissonancePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1957
- The learning and utilization of contravaluant material.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956
- The learning and forgetting of controversial material.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1943