Data protection legislation: interpretation and barriers to research
- 7 October 2000
- Vol. 321 (7265) , 890-892
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7265.890
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Storage of human organs prompts three inquiriesPublished by BMJ ,2000
- Bristol inquiry into baby deaths to move into new phaseBMJ, 2000
- Doctors suspended in child health inquiry2000
- Injury surveillance programmes, ethics, and the data protection Act1999
- Injury surveillance programmes, ethics, and the Data Protection Act Sharing data to prevent injuries Potential problems for tenants The legal position Ethical viewpointBMJ, 1999
- Research Based on Archived Information and Samples1999
- Informed consent: edging forwards (and backwards)BMJ, 1998
- Ethical debate: Informed consent in medical research Informed consent---a response to recent correspondence Changing the BMJ's position on informed consent would be counterproductive Informed consent---a publisher's duty Trial subjects must be fully involved in design and approval of trials Studies that do not have informed consent from participants should not be publishedBMJ, 1998