Value of visual versus central quantitative measurements of angiographic success after Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty
- 1 May 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 77 (12) , 1067-1072
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00133-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteriesAmerican Heart Journal, 1994
- Inability of coronary blood flow reserve measurements to assess the efficacy of coronary angioplasty in the first 24 hours in unselected patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in 1985–1986 and 1977–1981New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Long-Term Follow-up after Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary AngioplastyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms.Circulation, 1985
- Does Visual Interpretation of the Coronary Arteriogram Predict the Physiologic Importance of a Coronary Stenosis?New England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Quantification of coronary arterial narrowing at necropsy in acute transmural myocardial infarction. Analysis and comparison of findings in 27 patients and 22 controls.Circulation, 1980
- Nonoperative Dilatation of Coronary-Artery StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Quantitative coronary arteriography: estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using the arteriogram and digital computation.Circulation, 1977
- Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms.Circulation, 1975