Biomechanical Stresses as Related to Motion Trajectory of Lifting
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 25 (5) , 527-539
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088302500507
Abstract
A laboratory study was conducted to assess the effects of lift angle on biomechanical stresses to the musculoskeletal system, and in particular, on the lower back. Male subjects were required to lift four different tote boxes from the floor to a height of 0.81 m using two different lifting techniques. Maximum acceptable weights were determined using a psychophysical method. The motion trajectory of lift was studied by means of stroboscopic photography. Moments and forces at various body joints were computed using a biomechanical strength model. Maximum acceptable weights were 16% (range = 9 to 23%) greater for the free-style lifting technique as compared with the squat method of lifting. There were large differences between the maximum acceptable weights and the "maximum permissible limits" recommended by NIOSH. The results showed that the subjects pulled the load toward the body when lifting psychophysically determined maximum weights. The lift angle increased with an increase in box width. The lift angle was greater for the free-style lifting method as compared with the squat lifting technique for lifting compact loads. Lifting at an angle resulted in a decrease in moment at the elbow, shoulder, L5IS1 disc, and hips, and an increase in moment at the knees and ankles. The estimated compressive force on the lumbar spine was, on the average, 11% lower for lifting at an angle as compared with a straight vertical lift.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamic strength test as a predictor for maximal and acceptable liftingErgonomics, 1981
- Container Characteristics and Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift1Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1980
- What Criteria Exist for Determining How Much Load Can Be Lifted Safely?Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1980
- A comparison of isometric strength and dynamic lifting capabilityErgonomics, 1980
- Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rateAihaj Journal, 1979
- The Ergonomics Society The Society's Lecture 1978. THE DESIGN OF MANUAL HANDLING TASKSErgonomics, 1978
- A method for evaluating the biomechanical stresses resulting from manual materials handling jobsAihaj Journal, 1977
- Dynamic Biomechanical Model for Sagittal Lifting ActivitiesProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1976
- A computerized biomechanical model—Development of and use in studying gross body actionsJournal of Biomechanics, 1969
- PUSH FORCES EXERTED IN SIXTY-FIVE COMMON WORKING POSITIONSPublished by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ,1969