Reform and Urban Bias in China
- 1 July 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Development Studies
- Vol. 29 (4) , 129-148
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389308422297
Abstract
Income inequalities between urban and rural areas remain high in China, but the gap has begun to narrow. Peasant incomes have increased dramatically since the post‐Mao reforms. Rural areas have new power, but this is a consequence not a cause of the reforms. The improvement in rural conditions reflects a change in the central state's development strategy and ideology, and the local response to incentives embedded in China's reforms. The impetus for these changes is self‐preservation of the state and the Chinese Communist Party. The failure to close decisively the income disparities between the urban and rural areas similarly stems from concerns of regime stability and preservation of the party‐state.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Fate of the Collective after the CommunePublished by JSTOR ,2017
- Getting Rich through Diligence:Published by JSTOR ,2017
- Sources of income inequality in post-reform ChinaChina Economic Review, 1993
- Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in ChinaWorld Politics, 1992
- Current Peasant Discontent in China: Backgrounds and Political ImplicationsChina Information, 1989
- Peasant Grain Marketing and State Procurement: China's Grain Contracting SystemThe China Quarterly, 1986
- Peasant Households Between Plan and MarketModern China, 1986
- Categorising space: Urban‐rural or core‐periphery in Sri LankaThe Journal of Development Studies, 1984
- Urban bias, rural bias or state bias? Urban‐rural relations in post‐revolutionary ChinaThe Journal of Development Studies, 1984
- Agriculture in China's Modern Economic DevelopmentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1983