Informed consent does not mean rational consent
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Legal Medicine
- Vol. 11 (3) , 321-350
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01947649009510831
Abstract
If all decisions by the patient could be made on an intelligent basis; if all patients had sufficient scientific background and sufficient knowledge of the human body; if the decisions of all patients could be sufficiently free of the fear of the unknown, of superstition and other extraneous influences upon the decision‐making processes; if all patients were able to understand the physician and communicate with him; if the physician were not faced with these and various other impediments, doctor‐patient accord would be a problem of manageable proportions.1Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrasesPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- How Medical Professionals Evaluate Expressions of ProbabilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Malpractice Prevention through the Sharing of UncertaintyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Adding Insult to InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative TherapiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Speech and SurvivalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- A survey of the effects of oral contraceptive patient informationPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1977
- An appraisal of patients’ reactions to “informed consent” for peroral endoscopyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1977
- For Harold Lasswell: Some Reflections on Human Dignity, Entrapment, Informed Consent, and the Plea BargainThe Yale Law Journal, 1975