The number of nucleotides required to determine the branching order of three species, with special reference to the human-chimpanzee-gorilla divergence
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Molecular Evolution
- Vol. 24 (1-2) , 189-204
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02099966
Abstract
A mathematical theory for computing the probabilities of various nucleotide configurations among related species is developed, and the probability of obtaining the correct tree (topology) from nucleotide sequence data is evaluated using models of evolutionary trees that are close to the tree of mitochondrial DNAs from human, chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, and gibbon. Special attention is given to the number of nucleotides required to resolve the branching order among the three most closely related organisms (human, chimpanzee, and gorilla). If the extent of DNA divergence is close to that obtained by Brown et al. for mitochondrial DNA and if sequence data are available only for the three most closely related organisms, the number of nucleotides (m*) required to obtain the correct tree with a probability of 95% is about 4700. If sequence data for two outgroup species (orangutan and gibbon) are available, m* becomes about 2600–2700 when the transformed distance, distance-Wagner, maximum parsimony, or compatibility method is used. In the unweighted pair-group method, m* is not affected by the availability of data from outgroup species. When these five different tree-making methods, as well as Fitch and Margoliash's method, are applied to the mitochondrial DNA data (1834 bp) obtained by Brown et al. and by Hixson and Brown, they all give the same phylogenetic tree, in which human and chimpanzee are most closely related. However, the trees considered here are “gene trees,” and to obtain the correct “species tree,” sequence data for several independent loci must be used.This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distance Methods and the Approximation of Most-Parsimonious TreesSystematic Zoology, 1985
- Nonrandomness of point mutation as reflected in nucleotide substitutions in pseudogenes and its evolutionary implicationsJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1984
- Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular dataJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1982
- Patterns of nucleotide substitution in pseudogenes and functional genesJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1982
- Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: Tempo and mode of evolutionJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1982
- A practical method for calculating evolutionary trees from sequence dataJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1981
- Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genomeNature, 1981
- A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequencesJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1980
- On the Problem of Discovering the Most Parsimonious TreeThe American Naturalist, 1977
- Construction of Phylogenetic TreesScience, 1967