Ductal invasive G2 and G3 carcinomas of the breast are the end stages of at least two different lines of genetic evolution
- 23 April 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Pathology
- Vol. 194 (2) , 165-170
- https://doi.org/10.1002/path.875
Abstract
Ductal invasive grade (G) 2 and G3 carcinomas represent the majority of invasive breast cancers. Previous morphological and cytogenetic studies have provided evidence that ductal invasive G2 carcinoma may originate from at least two different genetic pathways. The aim of this study was to evaluate further the heterogeneity of G2 breast cancer in comparison with G3 cancers by cytogenetic and quantitative analysis. To this end, 35 cases of ductal invasive G2 and 42 cases of ductal invasive G3 carcinomas were investigated by means of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and these findings were correlated with DNA ploidy status, mitotic activity index (MAI), mean nuclear area (MNA), volume per lumen (VPL), and clinico‐pathological parameters. The findings of this study demonstrate that ductal invasive G2 carcinomas, in contrast to ductal invasive G3 carcinomas, have to be interpreted as the morphological end stage resulting from two different cytogenetic and morphological pathways; the loss of 16q material is the cytogenetic key event in the evolution of a subgroup of this entity. By correlating genetic alterations with DNA ploidy status, an extended morphology‐based cytogenetic progression model is presented, with early and late genetic alterations in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. The correlation with MAI gives rise to the hypothesis that these different genetic pathways significantly differ in their proliferation rate. Further studies will be required to elucidate which genes contribute to an altered proliferation rate in these subgroups and to the associated prognosis. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Photographic Atlas of Practical Anatomy. : W Thiel. (pound191.50.) Springer-Verlag, 1999. ISBN 3 540 62239 X.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2000
- Patterns of chromosomal imbalances in invasive breast cancerInternational Journal of Cancer, 2000
- Different genetic pathways in the evolution of invasive breast cancer are associated with distinct morphological subtypesThe Journal of Pathology, 1999
- Genetic alterations on chromosome 16 and 17 are important features of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and are associated with histologic typeBritish Journal of Cancer, 1999
- Comparative genomic hybridization of ductal carcinomain situ of the breast?evidence of multiple genetic pathwaysThe Journal of Pathology, 1999
- Genetic analysis of 53 lymph node-negative breast carcinomas by CGH and relation to clinical, pathological, morphometric, and DNA cytometric prognostic factorsThe Journal of Pathology, 1998
- Interlaboratory reproducibility of semiautomated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms obtained from fresh material of 1,295 breast cancer casesHuman Pathology, 1996
- Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. IV: Should you be a typer or a grader? A comparative study of two histological prognostic features in operable breast carcinomaHistopathology, 1995
- Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1994
- Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long‐term follow‐upHistopathology, 1992