General practitioners' attitudes to randomised clinical trials for women with breast cancer
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- healthcare
- Published by AMPCo in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 171 (6) , 303-305
- https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb123662.x
Abstract
Objective To determine general practitioners' attitudes to randomised clinical trials for women with breast cancer. Design Cross‐sectional survey with structured face‐to‐face interviews conducted between December 1997 and May 1998. Participants A random sample of GPs in central Sydney. Main outcome measures GPs' attitudes to referring women with breast cancer to specialists who enrol patients in randomised clinical trials, and to randomised clinical trials in general. Results 85 of 158 GPs (54%) consented to be interviewed. Of these 85 GPs, 47% stated that they would refer a woman with breast cancer to a specialist who was likely to enrol the woman in a clinical trial; 50% believed that clinical trials increase knowledge about treatment options; and 15% thought that randomised trials may make a valuable scientific contribution. However, 43% of GPs expressed concerns that their patients may be disadvantaged, 39% said that they wanted optimum treatment for their patients, 18% that they would want to know what the trial was about, and 12% were worried about ethical considerations. Conclusions Many of the GPs in this survey have concerns about randomised clinical trials for women with breast cancer. Improved communication between specialists and GPs about the conduct of and treatments offered in clinical trials for breast cancer may change this attitude.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- BARRIERS TO PARTICIPATION IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS FOR EARLY BREAST CANCER AMONG AUSTRALIAN CANCER SPECIALISTSAnz Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trialsThe Lancet, 1998
- Effects of Radiotherapy and Surgery in Early Breast Cancer — An Overview of the Randomized TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Can we improve the professional and personal fulfilment of doctors in cancer medicine?British Journal of Cancer, 1995
- Efficacy of Screening MammographyJAMA, 1995
- Impact of clinical trials on clinical practice: example of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarctionThe Lancet, 1993
- On clinical trial participation.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Participants in prospective, randomized clinical trials for resected non-small cell lung cancer have improved survival compared with nonparticipants in such trialsCancer, 1985
- THE VALUE OF PARTICIPATING IN AN ASTHMA TRIALThe Lancet, 1985
- Physicians’ Reasons for Not Entering Eligible Patients in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgery for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984