Age-associated memory impairment diagnoses: Problems of reliability and concerns for terminology.
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychology and Aging
- Vol. 6 (4) , 551-558
- https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.6.4.551
Abstract
Objective memory criteria for diagnosing age-associated memory impairment (AAMI), age-consistent memory impairment, and late-life forgetfulness (LLF) were applied to 523 cognitively normal older persons divided into 2 groups on the basis of the clinical memory assessment battery they received. Seventy-seven percent of Group 2 and 98% of Group 1 met the Crook et al. (1986) cognitive criteria for AAMI on at least 1 test. Rates based on individual tests varied from 7% to 96%. Objective-cognitive criteria for LLF were met by no members of Group 1 but by 31% of Group 2. Results suggest that, as proposed, the criteria for age-related diagnoses lack reliability. Concerns regarding the diagnosis of normal memory in older populations are considered.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (AVLT): Norms for ages 55 years and older.Psychological Assessment, 1990
- Dimensions of everyday memory in age-associated memory impairment.Psychological Assessment, 1989
- Criteria for diagnosing age‐associated memory impairment: Proposed improvements from the fieldDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 1989
- Senescent forgetfulness: A quantitative studyDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 1986
- Age‐associated memory impairment: Proposed diagnostic criteria and measures of clinical change — report of a national institute of mental health work groupDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 1986