Comment on "Kinetic theory of single-particle motion in a fluid"
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 19 (1) , 416-418
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.19.416
Abstract
The reason Mehaffey and Cukier did not obtain the hydrodynamic Stokes-Einstein relation for the diffusion coefficient of a large particle from kinetic theory is that they did not carry their calculation far enough. When the terms in the repeated-ring sum are evaluated more completely and then summed, the proper hydrodynamic Stokes-Einstein form is obtained. This procedure does not affect Mehaffey and Cukier's results for the long time behavior of the velocity-autocorrelation function. Some inconsistent approximations in Mehaffey and Cukier's ring sum are also discussed here.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Kinetic theory of single-particle motion in a fluidPhysical Review A, 1978
- Kinetic-Theory Derivation of the Stokes-Einstein LawPhysical Review Letters, 1977
- Long time expansion of two-dimensional correlation functionsPhysica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 1977
- Velocity-correlation functions in two and three dimensions. II. Higher densityPhysical Review A, 1975
- Velocity-Correlation Functions in Two and Three Dimensions: Low DensityPhysical Review A, 1972