Bioactivity of Serum and Pituitary Prolactin during the Rat Estrous Cycle
- 1 May 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Endocrine Society in Endocrinology
- Vol. 118 (5) , 1886-1891
- https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-118-5-1886
Abstract
The availability of a mitogenic bioassay for PRL in which multiple, small samples could be analyzed led us to examine circulating and pituitary PRL bioactivity during the estrous cycle of the rat. Bio- (B) and immuno (I)-activities were compared in individual samples using rat PRL RP-1 standard. B:I ratios ranged between 2.3 and 6.8 for serum and 1.4 and 3.2 for pituitaries. Serum bioactivity increased 24-fold during the surge of PRL on the afternoon of proestrous, whereas pituitary bioactivity decreased almost 5-fold during this time period. Serum B:I ratios were significantly (P < 0.01) elevated on the day of proestrus (0900-1800 h) compared to those on diestrous day 2. Pituitary B:I ratios ranged from a high of 2.3 .+-. 0.3 on diestrous day 2 and 1500 h on proestrus to 1.8 .+-. 0.1 on diestrous day 1. Differences between mean B:I ratios of pituitaries obtained at different cycle stages were not statistically significant. Interestingly, serum B and I were not correlated (r = 0.55, 0.68) at the peak of the proestrous PRL surge when pituitary extracts exhibited the highest correlation (r = 0.94). The augmented bioactivity of serum compared to that in pituitaries was not due to a synergistic serum effect. It is likely that the proestrous PRL surge, similar to the preovulatory LH surge, results from secretion of a pool of high biological activity. Since no evidence was found for a lactogen synergist in the circulation, the difference between serum and pituitary bioactivity could reflect an averaging of releasable and nonreleasable pools of PRL with varying degrees of biopotency. That these differences result from postsecretion enhancement of PRL biopotency, possibly due to changes in molecular structure and/or conformation, also cannot be ruled out. PRL biopotency in the circulation of the rat is much higher than that reported for women, perhaps reflecting the physiological relevance of PRL to luteal function in the rat.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correlation of Nb2 Bioassay and Radioimmunoassay Values for Human Serum Prolactin*Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1983
- Rat lymphoma cell bioassay for prolactin: Observations on its use and comparison with radioimmunoassayLife Sciences, 1982
- EPISODIC SECRETORY PATTERNS OF RAT PROLACTIN DETERMINED BY BIOASSAY AND RADIOIMMUNOASSAYEndocrinology, 1982
- IDENTIFICATION OF A LESS IMMUNOREACTIVE FORM OF PROLACTIN IN THE RAT PITUITARYEndocrinology, 1981
- A New Sensitive and Specific Bioassay for Lactogenic Hormones: Measurement of Prolactin and Growth Hormone in Human Serum*Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1980
- Relationship between Radioreceptor Assay and Radioimmunoassay Estimates of Prolactin in Rat Pituitary Tissue, Incubation Medium, and Serum: Effects of Dialysis on Measurements of the Hormone*Endocrinology, 1980
- Relationship between Bioassay and Radioimmunoassay Estimates of Prolactin in Rat Serum*Endocrinology, 1978
- Electrophoretically Separable Forms of Rat Prolactin with Different Bioassay and Radioimmunoassay Activities*Endocrinology, 1978
- RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BIOASSAY, RADIOIMMUNOASSAY AND DISC ELECTROPHORETIC ASSAY METHODS OF MEASURING RAT PROLACTIN IN PITUITARY TISSUE AND INCUBATION MEDIUMJournal of Endocrinology, 1977
- THE REGULATION OF CORPUS LUTEUM FUNCTION BY HYPOPHYSIAL LUTEOTROPHIN1Endocrinology, 1941