Comparison of Intravenous Terbutaline Versus Normal Saline in Pediatric Patients on Continuous High-Dose Nebulized Albuterol for Status Asthmaticus
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pediatric Emergency Care
- Vol. 23 (6) , 355-361
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pec.0000278397.63246.33
Abstract
To determine if the addition of intravenous terbutaline provides any clinical benefit to children with acute severe asthma already on continuous high-dose nebulized albuterol. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial on pediatric patients with acute severe asthma presenting to a large inner city tertiary children's emergency department. Consecutive patients between 2 and 17 years of age who failed acute asthma management and needed intensive care unit admission underwent informed consent and were enrolled into the study. Patients not requiring intubation were randomized to receive either intravenous terbutaline or intravenous normal saline while on continuous high-dose nebulized albuterol, ipratropium bromide, and systemic corticosteroids. Outcome measures included a clinical asthma severity score, hours on continuous nebulized albuterol, and duration of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit. In addition, electrocardiograms, electrolytes, lactic acid, and troponin I levels were obtained at routine intervals during the first 24 hours after admission. Patients who significantly worsened while enrolled in the study received intravenous aminophylline according to protocol. Forty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Patients on terbutaline had a mean improvement in the clinical asthma severity score over the first 24 hours of 6.5 points compared with 4.8 points in the placebo group (P = 0.073). Patients on terbutaline spent 38.19 hours on continuous nebulized albuterol compared with their placebo counterparts who spent 51.93 hours (P = 0.25). The length of stay in the PICU was on average 12.95 hours longer for those patients in the placebo group as compared with the terbutaline group (P = 0.345). One patient was removed from the study for a significant cardiac dysrhythmia. This patient was in the terbutaline group and recovered without complications. Troponin I values at 12 hours and 24 hours were elevated in 3 patients each, all within the terbutaline group. No outcome measures demonstrated statistical significance. Outcome measures revealed a trend toward improvement in the terbutaline group. Before recommending routine use of intravenous terbutaline for acute severe asthma, further study to determine safety and efficacy is necessary.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Theophylline versus terbutaline in treating critically ill children with status asthmaticus: A prospective, randomized, controlled trialPediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2005
- The Effectiveness of IV β-Agonists in Treating Patients with Acute Asthma in the Emergency DepartmentChest, 2002
- Cardiac toxicity of intravenous terbutaline for the treatment of severe asthma in children: A prospective assessmentThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2000
- Continuous intravenous terbutaline for pediatric status asthmaticusCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- A prospective, randomized study of continuous versus intermittent nebulized albuterol for severe status asthmaticus in childrenCritical Care Medicine, 1993
- Evaluation of the properties and reliability of a clinical severity scale for acute asthma in childrenJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- The Pulmonary IndexAmerican Journal of Diseases of Children, 1984
- Comparison of inhaled and intravenous terbutaline in acute severe asthma.Thorax, 1981
- Cerebral protection during open-heart surgery.Thorax, 1977
- Metabolic effects of intravenous salbutamol in the course of acute severe asthma.Thorax, 1977