Reflections on an argument that won't go away: Or, a turn of the ideological screw

1 November 1992

journal article
research article
Published by Taylor & Francis in Quarterly Journal of Speech

Vol. 78 (4) , 450-465
https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639209384010

Abstract

This essay revisits the discussion that followed the 1983 publication of Philip Wander's “The Ideological Turn in Modern Criticism.” It reviews the debate briefly, clarifies the meaning of the term “ideological criticism,” and demonstrates that the critics who opposed Wander's position themselves adhered to a partial and exclusionary academic ideology. Specifically, the essay shows how those critics subscribed to an essentialist notion of rhetoric, adopted a theory of innocent reading, and displayed unexamined prejudices about canonical texts. This essay concludes with a call for academic rhetoricians to realize the ethical urgency of their acknowledging that all rhetorical criticism is saturated with ideological presuppositions.

Keywords

This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:

Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis
Communication Monographs, 1989
Rhetorical criticism as moral action
Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1989
Responses to wander
Central States Speech Journal, 1984
Responses to wander
Central States Speech Journal, 1984
Responses to wander
Central States Speech Journal, 1983
Responses to wander
Central States Speech Journal, 1983
Responses to wander
Central States Speech Journal, 1983
Responses to wander
Central States Speech Journal, 1983
The ideological turn in modern criticism
Central States Speech Journal, 1983
The rhetoric of confrontation
Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1969