Comparison of two standard chemotherapy regimens for good-prognosis germ-cell tumours: a randomised trial
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 357 (9258) , 739-745
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04165-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence of testicular germ-cell malignancies in England and Wales: Trends in children compared with adultsInternational Journal of Cancer, 1999
- RISING RISK OF TESTICULAR CANCER BY BIRTH COHORT IN THE UNITED STATES FROM 1973 TO 1995Journal of Urology, 1999
- Long-term follow-up of a phase III study of three versus four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin in favorable-prognosis germ-cell tumors: the Indian University experience.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Bleomycin in germ cell tumor therapy: not all regimens are created equal.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Assessment of Risk in Metastatic Testis Carcinoma: Impact on TreatmentUrologia Internationalis, 1991
- A randomized trial of etoposide + cisplatin versus vinblastine + bleomycin + cisplatin + cyclophosphamide + dactinomycin in patients with good-prognosis germ cell tumors.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1988
- Treatment of Disseminated Germ-Cell Tumors with Cisplatin, Bleomycin, and either Vinblastine or EtoposideNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The treatment of metastatic germ-cell testicular tumours with bleomycin, etoposide and cis-platin (BEP)British Journal of Cancer, 1983
- The Role of Maintenance Therapy in Disseminated Testicular CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Non‐seminoma Germ Cell Tumours (Malignant Teratoma) of the Testis Results of Treatment and an Analysis of Prognostc Factors*British Journal of Urology, 1981