Immune characteristics of graft rejection in nemerteans of the genus Lineus
- 1 January 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 12 (9) , 705-708
- https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830120902
Abstract
The rejection of xenogeneic grafts in marine worms of the genus Lineus (Nemertea) gives evidence for the occurence of immune mechanisms in these invertebrates. First, second‐set response is anamnestic with a three‐month memory component. Second, the accelerated rejection of second‐set grafts occurs anywhere in the body of the recipient, that is to say it is systemic. Third, the anamnestic response is species‐specific since it takes place only when second grafts are from donors of the same species as that of the first set. It is therefore plausible that the reaction to xenogeneic grafts is a cell‐mediated immune mechanism and that the self‐nonself discrimination may be a function of nemertean cells specialized for recognition at the species level and for memory.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evolution of the lymphocyteImmunology Today, 1981
- CHARACTERISTICS OF TRANSPLANTATION IMMUNITY IN THE SPONGE, CALLYSPONGIA DIFFUSATransplantation, 1980
- ALLOGENEIC POLYMORPHISM AND ALLOIMMUNE MEMORY IN THE CORAL, MONTIPORA VERRUCOSATransplantation, 1980
- VIABLE ANIMALS OBTAINED BY GRAFTING PIECES FROM SEVERAL NEMERTEAN ADULTSTransplantation, 1980
- The basis of graft rejection in the earthworms Lumbricus terrestris and Eisenia foetidaJournal of Invertebrate Pathology, 1978
- Survival of body wall autographs, allografts, and xenografts in the earthworm Eisenia foetidaJournal of Invertebrate Pathology, 1978
- Immunological specificity and memory in a scleractinian coralNature, 1977
- SPECIFIC ALLOGRAFT REACTIVITY IN THE SEA STAR Dermasterias imbricataTransplantation, 1976
- TRANSPLANTATION IMMUNITY IN ANNELIDS I. REJECTION OF XENOGRAFTS EXCHANGED BETWEEN LUMBRICUS TERRESTRIS AND EISENIA FOETIDATransplantation, 1968
- A METHOD FOR RAPID GRAPHIC SOLUTION OF TIME-PER CENT EFFECT CURVES1949