The Helsinki Heart Study: an 8.5‐year safety and mortality follow‐up
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 235 (1) , 31-39
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb01029.x
Abstract
Earlier monitoring of all symptoms, hospital admissions, cancer diagnoses and causes of death during gemfibrozil treatment had raised some suspicions which called for further follow-up. Close monitoring of selected, potentially adverse events amongst treated subjects after a placebo-controlled trial and comparing occurrences to those in various untreated groups. All participants of the Helsinki Heart Study (a controlled, 5-year, multi-clinic coronary heart disease (CHD) primary prevention trial with gemfibrozil and placebo) were offered gemfibrozil treatment and twice yearly follow-up for 3.5 years. Untreated groups in the source population and national cancer statistics were utilized in comparisons. Of the 2046 dyslipidaemic men initially randomized to gemfibrozil, 2002 survivors entered the 3.5-year follow-up; of the 2035 initial placebo men, 1992 continued to be monitored. Gemfibrozil was chosen for the follow-up by 66.3% of the gemfibrozil-treated and 68.5% of the placebo-treated men. Gastrointestinal symptoms, surgery, strokes, cancer incidence, mortality by cause. Gastrointestinal symptoms remained more common in the original gemfibrozil group. After 8.5 years strokes numbered 32 (gemfibrozil) vs. 37 (placebo), violent deaths 16 vs. 14, and cancers 51 in both groups. Total mortality was equal during the original 5 years, but higher in the gemfibrozil group post-trial, leading to an 8.5 year mortality of 101 vs. placebo 83 (P = 0.19). This was mainly a result of higher cancer mortality in the gemfibrozil (30) than the placebo group (18, P = 0.08). An additional 18-month post-study registry follow-up disclosed 13 placebo and five gemfibrozil cancer deaths, altering the cancer mortality to gemfibrozil 35 vs. placebo 31 at 10 years. The most plausible explanation for the discrepancy between cancer incidence and cancer-specific mortality, based mainly on comparison with untreated groups, is delayed diagnosis. The increased cancer and total mortality is most probably due to chance, based on the later reversal of trends.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Helsinki Heart Study: coronary heart disease incidence during an extended follow‐upJournal of Internal Medicine, 1994
- WHO clofibrate/cholesterol trial: clarificationsThe Lancet, 1992
- Serum cholesterol and hemorrhagic stroke in the Honolulu Heart Program.Stroke, 1989
- Final Report on the Aspirin Component of the Ongoing Physicians' Health StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Serum Cholesterol Levels and Six-Year Mortality from Stroke in 350,977 Men Screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Gemfibrozil and Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Helsinki Heart Study: Primary-Prevention Trial with Gemfibrozil in Middle-Aged Men with DyslipidemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Fifteen year mortality in Coronary Drug Project patients: Long-term benefit with niacinJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1986
- Risk factors for cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction in a Japanese rural community.Stroke, 1982
- Gallbladder Disease as a Side Effect of Drugs Influencing Lipid Metabolism Experience in the Coronary Drug ProjectNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977