Sample size and power for comparing two or more treatment groups in clinical trials.
- 9 September 1989
- Vol. 299 (6700) , 663-665
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.299.6700.663
Abstract
Methods for determining sample size and power when comparing two groups in clinical trials are widely available. Studies comparing three or more treatments are not uncommon but are more difficult to analyse. A linear nomogram was devised to help calculate the sample size required when comparing up to five parallel groups. It may also be used retrospectively to determine the power of a study of given sample size. In two worked examples the nomogram was efficient. Although the nomogram offers only 5% and 1% significance levels and can be used only for up to five treatment groups, this is sufficient for most researchers.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiopulmonary response to dynamic exercise after heart and combined heart-lung transplantation.Heart, 1989
- GLYCOPYRRONIUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTAGONISM OF THE MUSCARINIC SIDE EFFECTS OF EDROPHONIUM †British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1989
- CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS OF PRE-SPECIFIED SIZEThe Lancet, 1988
- Graphical aid for determining power of clinical trials involving two groups.BMJ, 1988
- EFFECT OF CISAPRIDE ON MORPHINE-INDUCED DELAY IN GASTRIC EMPTYINGBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1987
- Differential effects of the anxiolytic drugs, diazepam and buspirone, on memory function.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1987
- Confidence estimation and the size of a clinical trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1984
- Comparing Three GroupsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1983
- Sample Size Determinations for r x c Comparative TrialsBiometrics, 1977
- A METHOD FOR THE RAPID DETERMINATION OF THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS TO INCLUDE IN A CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALThe Lancet, 1966