Theoretical studies of the mechanism of the action of the neurohypophyseal hormones. I. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) and molecular electrostatic field (MEF) maps of some vasopressin analogues
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
- Vol. 3 (3) , 261-284
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01533072
Abstract
Summary Continuing our theoretical studies of the oxytocin and vasopressin analogues, we have analysed the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) and the norm of the molecular electrostatic field (MEF) of [1-β-mercaptopropionic acid]-arginine-vasopressin ([Mpa1]-AVP), [1-(β-mercapto-β,β-cyclopentamethylene)propionic acid]-arginine-vasopressin ([Cpp′]-AVP), and [1-thiosalicylic acid]-arginine-vasopressin ([Ths′]-AVP) whose low-energy conformations were calculated in our previous work. These compounds are known from experiment to exhibit different biological activity. The scalar fields mentioned determine the energy of interaction with either charged (MEP) or polar (MEF) species, the energy being in the second case either optimal or Boltzmann-averaged over all the possible orientations of the dipole moment versus the electrostatic field. The electrostatic interactions slowly vanish with distance and can therefore be considered to be the factor determining the molecular shape at greater distances, which can help in both predicting the interactions with the receptor at the stage of remote recognition and in finding the preferred directions of solvation by a polar solvent. In the analysis of the fields three techniques have been used: (i) the construction of maps in certain planes; (ii) the construction of maps on spheres centered in the charge center of the molecule under study and of poles chosen according to the main axes of the quadrupole moment; and (iii) the construction of surfaces corresponding to a given value of potential. The results obtained show that the shapes of both MEP and MEF are similar in the case of [Mpa1]-AVP and [Cpp1-AVP (biologically active), while some differences emerge when comparing these compounds with [Ths1]-AVP (inactive). It has also been found that both MEP and MEF depend even more strongly on conformation.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Molecular recognition: blindsearching for regions of strong structural match on the surfaces of two dissimilar moleculesJournal of Molecular Graphics, 1988
- Molecular recognition. I. Automatic identification of topographic surface featuresBiopolymers, 1985
- A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromoleculesJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1985
- An approach to computing electrostatic charges for moleculesJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1984
- A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteinsJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1984
- Lysinium, argininum, glutamate, and aspartate ions in water solutionBiopolymers, 1983
- [1-(.beta.-mercapto-.beta.,.beta.-cyclopentamethylenepropionic acid),2-(O-methyl)tyrosine]arginine-vasopressin and [1-(.beta.-mercapto-.beta.,.beta.-cyclopentamethylenepropionic acid)]arginine-vasopressin, two highly potent antagonists of the vasopressor response to arginine-vasopressinJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1980
- Enkephalin: Structure‐function relationshipsFEBS Letters, 1978
- Electrostatic potentials of proteins. 1. Carboxypeptidase AJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1976
- A model for drug-receptor remote recognition applied to certain hydrogen bonding systemsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1976