CCN predictions: Is theory sufficient for assessments of the indirect effect?
- 15 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 33 (5)
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl025148
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chemical and dynamical effects on cloud droplet number: Implications for estimates of the aerosol indirect effectJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2004
- Chemical Amplification (or Dampening) of the Twomey Effect: Conditions Derived from Droplet Activation TheoryJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2004
- Asian dust storm events of spring 2001 and associated pollutants observed in New England by the Atmospheric Investigation, Regional Modeling, Analysis and Prediction (AIRMAP) monitoring networkJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2004
- Toward aerosol/cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) closure during CRYSTAL‐FACEJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003
- Aerosol activation in marine stratocumulus clouds: 2. Köhler and parcel theory closure studiesJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003
- Aerosol activation in marine stratocumulus clouds: 1. Measurement validation for a closure studyJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003
- Can chemical effects on cloud droplet number rival the first indirect effect?Geophysical Research Letters, 2002
- Hygroscopic properties of aerosol particles over the central Arctic Ocean during summerJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2001
- On the parameterization of activation spectra from cloud condensation nuclei microphysical propertiesJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2000
- Aerosol observations at Chebogue Point during the 1993 North Atlantic Regional Experiment: Relationships among cloud condensation nuclei, size distribution, and chemistryJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1996