‘Events’ and ‘causes’ in cabinet termination and survival: Is explanation still possible?
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in West European Politics
- Vol. 19 (1) , 51-68
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389608425120
Abstract
The ‘events approach’ claims for a new explanation of cabinet termination and cabinet survival in parliamentary democracies. The failure of the universal laws set by the culturalist approach and the party system approach raised the question whether one should search for random or probabilistic events of cabinet termination and survival. It is argued that the events approach fails both for the epistemological weakness of its premises and for the poverty of its empirical conclusions. A reappraisal of theoretical enterprise is advanced and a new research perspective is sketched, which requires a more careful treatment of the non‐uniform institutional features of parliamentary democracies.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constraints on Cabinet Formation in Parliamentary DemocraciesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1994
- Economic Trends and Government Survival in West European Parliamentary DemocraciesAmerican Political Science Review, 1992
- Rising Hazards: An Underlying Dynamic of Parliamentary GovernmentAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1992
- Ideological Diversity and Government Survival in Western European Parliamentary DemocraciesComparative Political Studies, 1992
- The Cabinet Stability Controversy: New Perspectives on a Classic ProblemAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1992
- Contending Models of Cabinet StabilityAmerican Political Science Review, 1988
- Legislative-Executive Relations and Legislative OversightLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1984
- An “Events” Approach to the Problem of Cabinet StabilityComparative Political Studies, 1984
- Measures of Cabinet DurabilityComparative Political Studies, 1984
- Party Systems and Government StabilityAmerican Political Science Review, 1971