Out Of Sight, Out Of Mind: Why Doesn’t Widespread Clinical Quality Failure Command Our Attention?
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 22 (2) , 119-127
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.119
Abstract
This paper examines the tolerance by all stakeholders of increasingly well documented evidence of serious and widespread clinical quality failure in the United States. Using research evidence from psychology, it describes specific cognitive and motivational impediments to the perception of quality failure—those shared by all stakeholders and those particularly relevant to patients and their families and to health care professionals. The authors endorse efforts by the National Quality Forum and others to make quality failure more publicly visible. They also point to the pivotal role of health care industry leaders in sustaining focus on a problem that inherently resists visibility.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Views of Practicing Physicians and the Public on Medical ErrorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The Wrong PatientAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- How Good Is the Quality of Health Care in the United States?The Milbank Quarterly, 1998
- The Urgent Need to Improve Health Care QualityInstitute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care QualityJAMA, 1998
- Protective and Damaging Effects of Stress MediatorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Availability, Wishful Thinking, and Physicians' Diagnostic Judgments for Patients with Suspected BacteremiaMedical Decision Making, 1991
- My Medical Care Is Better Than YoursMedical Care, 1986
- Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problemsJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 1982
- The processes of causal attribution.American Psychologist, 1973