AN APPRAISAL OF PREFERENCE FOR MULTIPLE versus MIXED SCHEDULES1
- 1 July 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 22 (1) , 31-38
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1974.22-31
Abstract
Pigeons' choice responses on either of two keys occasionally produced entry into a terminal link associated with that key. During the terminal links, responses produced access to grain according to mixed- or multiple-interval schedules. The multiple schedules provided stimuli correlated with the interval of time preceding reinforcement whereas the mixed schedules did not. The two subjects reliably preferred the multiple schedules to the mixed schedules throughout a series of replications. Preference for the multiple schedule was much smaller than suggested by earlier work comparing multiple and mixed schedules that had much higher rates of entry into the terminal links. Preference for the multiple schedule was greatly increased in this study when the rate of entry into the terminal schedules was increased. As in previous studies, these high preferences may have been the result of a sharp increase in the number of reinforcements on the multiple (as opposed to the mixed) schedule. The reliable but smaller preferences for the multiple schedule found with lower rates of entry into the terminal links were unconfounded by differences in the number of reinforcements obtained in the two terminal links.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intracranial reinforcement in pigeons: An analysis using concurrent schedulesPhysiology & Behavior, 1972
- PREFERENCE FOR MIXED‐INTERVAL VERSUS FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES: NUMBER OF COMPONENT INTERVALS1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972
- CHOICE AND RATE OF REINFORCEMENT1,2Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969
- EFFECTS OF REQUIRED RATES OF RESPONDING UPON CHOICE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- PREFERENCE FOR MIXED‐ VERSUS FIXED‐RATIO SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967
- Value of knowing when reinforcement is due.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966
- APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964
- SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964
- CONCURRENT PERFORMANCES: A BASELINE FOR THE STUDY OF REINFORCEMENT MAGNITUDE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963
- Schedules of reinforcement.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1957