Measuring blood pressure in pregnant women: A comparison of direct and indirect methods
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 171 (3) , 661-667
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(94)90079-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of Hypertension in Pregnancy: Executive SummaryThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1993
- Indirect blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: Korotkoff phase 4 versus phase 5American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992
- Recommendations for Routine Blood Pressure Measurement by Indirect Cuff SphygmomanometryAmerican Journal of Hypertension, 1992
- Conflicting views on the measurement of blood pressure in pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Assessment of four ambulatory blood pressure monitors and measurements by clinicians versus intraarterial blood pressure at rest and during exerciseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Recommendations on blood pressure measurement.BMJ, 1986
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- An Evaluation of Automated Indirect Blood Pressure Measurement During PregnancyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1986
- DIRECT AND INDIRECT BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN PREGNANCYBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1969
- The Indirect Method of Recording Blood PressureCardiovascular Research, 1968