Combining ecological and individual variables to reduce confounding by indication:
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 53 (12) , 1236-1241
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00251-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uses of Ecologic Studies in the Assessment of Intended Treatment EffectsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Confounding and indication for treatment in evaluation of drug treatment for hypertensionBMJ, 1997
- Invited Commentary: Ecologic Studies—Biases, Misconceptions, and CounterexamplesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1994
- The Cochrane Lecture. The best and the enemy of the good: randomised controlled trials, uncertainty, and assessing the role of patient choice in medical decision making.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1994
- Effects of Nondifferential Exposure Misclassification in Ecologic StudiesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- The State of Outcome Research: Are We on Target?New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- THE ECOLOGICAL FALLACYAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1988
- Current problems and future challenges in randomized clinical trials.Circulation, 1984
- Using observational data from registries to compare treatments: The fallacy of omnimetricsStatistics in Medicine, 1984
- The need for randomization in the study of intended effectsStatistics in Medicine, 1983