Communicating Statistical Information
Top Cited Papers
- 22 December 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 290 (5500) , 2261-2262
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5500.2261
Abstract
Most people, experts included, have difficulties understanding and combining statistical information effectively. Hoffrage et al. demonstrate that these difficulties can be considerably reduced by communicating the information in terms of natural frequencies rather than in terms of probabilities. Several applications in medicine, legal decision-making, and education are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian reasoning: A reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers and McGraw (1999).Psychological Review, 1999
- How to improve Bayesian reasoning: Comment on Gigerenzer and Hoffrage (1995).Psychological Review, 1999
- The Interdependence of Science and LawScience, 1998
- AIDS counselling for low-risk clientsAIDS Care, 1998
- The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challengesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1996
- How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.Psychological Review, 1995
- Efficacy of Screening MammographyJAMA, 1995
- How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.Psychological Review, 1995
- Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunitiesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1982
- Interpretation by Physicians of Clinical Laboratory ResultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978