Prognosis of patients ≽70 years of age with non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction compared with younger patients with similar infarcts and with patients ≥70 years of age with Q-wave acute myocardial infarction
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 75 (1) , 18-22
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80519-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of age on use of thrombolytic therapy and mortality in acute myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients ≥65 years of age (from the 1985 to 1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Age-related prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (The multicenter diltiazem postinfarction trial)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Coronary arteriography 1984–1987: A report of the registry of the society for cardiac angiography and interventions. I. Results and complicationsCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1989
- Electrocardiographic evolution of posterior acute myocardial infarction: Importance of early precordial ST-segment depressionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Diltiazem and Reinfarction in Patients with Non-Q-Wave Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Coronary Arteriographic Findings Soon after Non-Q-Wave Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Factors presaging early recurrent myocardial infarction (“Extension”)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1981
- Acute myocardial infarction in hospitalized patients over age 70American Heart Journal, 1980
- Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography.Circulation, 1979