Clinically important change in quality of life in epilepsy
Open Access
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Vol. 73 (2) , 116-120
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.73.2.116
Abstract
Background: Health related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly recognised as an important outcome in epilepsy. However, interpretation of HRQOL data is difficult because there is no agreement on what constitutes a clinically important change in the scores of the various instruments. Objectives: To determine the minimum clinically important change, and small, medium, and large changes, in broadly used epilepsy specific and generic HRQOL instruments. Methods: Patients with difficult to control focal epilepsy (n = 136) completed the QOLIE-89, QOLIE-31, SF-36, and HUI-III questionnaires twice, six months apart. Patient centred estimates of minimum important change, and of small, medium, and large change, were assessed on self administered 15 point global rating scales. Using regression analysis, the change in each HRQOL instrument that corresponded to the various categories of change determined by patients was obtained. The results were validated in a subgroup of patients tested at baseline and at nine months. Results: The minimum important change was 10.1 for QOLIE-89, 11.8 for QOLIE-31, 4.6 for SF-36 MCS, 3.0 for SF-36 physical composite score, and 0.15 for HUI-III. All instruments differentiated between no change and minimum important change with precision, and QOLIE-89 and QOLIE-31 also distinguished accurately between minimum important change and medium or large change. Baseline HRQOL scores and the type of treatment (surgical or medical) had no impact on any of the estimates, and the results were replicated in the validation sample. Conclusions: These estimates of minimum important change, and small, medium, and large changes, in four HRQOL instruments in patients with epilepsy are robust and can distinguish accurately among different levels of change. The estimates allow for categorisation of patients into various levels of change in HRQOL, and will be of use in assessing the effect of interventions in individual patients.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determining Clinically Important Differences in Health Status MeasuresPharmacoEconomics, 1999
- Comparison of Three Quality of Life Instruments in Stable Angina Pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version IIIJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Development and Cross‐Cultural Translations of a 31‐Item Quality of Life in Epilepsy InventoryEpilepsia, 1998
- Understanding Changes in Health StatusMedical Care, 1997
- Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: A comparison of two techniquesPublished by Elsevier ,1996
- Development of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy InventoryEpilepsia, 1995
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, and Reliability Across Diverse Patient GroupsMedical Care, 1994
- Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaireJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Interpretation of quality of life changesQuality of Life Research, 1993
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989