Educational Research and Teaching: a response to David Hargreaves’ TTA lecture
Open Access
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Educational Research Journal
- Vol. 23 (2) , 141-161
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192970230203
Abstract
David Hargreaves has argued that educational research fails to provide a sound evidence‐base for teaching: it does not generate a cumulative body of knowledge; and it is not geared to resolving the classroom problems that teachers face. As a solution, he recommends that teachers play a more central role in setting the agenda for research and in carrying it out. I accept much of Hargreaves’ criticism of educational research as failing to develop cumulative knowledge, but I suggest that the problems involved in this are more difficult than he acknowledges, and that what he proposes is likely to worsen rather than solve the problem. I also question whether research can fulfill the direct role in relation to practice which Hargreaves envisages. He appeals to the example of evidence‐based medicine, but I suggest that this is problematic even in its own context. I conclude by raising questions about the sort of central planning of research that Hargreaves recommends.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- School Effectiveness Research and its Critics: alternative visions of schoolingCambridge Journal of Education, 1996
- Contracts, control and evaluationJournal of Education Policy, 1995
- THE PROBLEM OF THE CONCEPT:Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1989
- Questioning ORACLE: an assessment of ORACLE'S analysis of teachers' questionsEducational Research, 1986
- Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 1975
- Three Dilemmas in Action ResearchHuman Relations, 1970
- The Practical: A Language for CurriculumThe School Review, 1969
- The Republic of scienceMinerva, 1962
- When shall we use our heads instead of the formula?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1957
- A Behavioral Model of Rational ChoiceThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955