Current epistemological problems in evidence based medicine
Open Access
- 13 April 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 30 (2) , 131-135
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.007039
Abstract
Evidence based medicine has been a topic of considerable controversy in medical and health care circles over its short lifetime, because of the claims made by its exponents about the criteria used to assess the evidence for or against the effectiveness of medical interventions. The central epistemological debates underpinning the debates about evidence based medicine are reviewed by this paper, and some areas are suggested where further work remains to be done. In particular, further work is needed on the theory of evidence and inference; causation and correlation; clinical judgment and collective knowledge; the structure of medical theory; and the nature of clinical effectiveness.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Declaration of Helsinki and Clinical Trials: A Focus on Placebo-Controlled Trials in SchizophreniaAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2003
- Interpreting ProbabilityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2002
- INDIFFERENCE OF SUBJECTS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO EQUIPOISE IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALSSocial Philosophy and Policy, 2002
- Witnesses of the body: medico-legal cases in seventeenth-century RomeStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2002
- The Virtues of EvidenceTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2002
- Systematic Reviews in Health CarePublished by Wiley ,2001
- Placebo-Controlled Trials and Active-Control Trials in the Evaluation of New Treatments. Part 2: Practical Issues and Specific CasesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2000
- Giving medicine a fair trialBMJ, 2000
- Equipoise, Knowledge and Ethics in Clinical Research and PracticeBioethics, 1999
- Why “underpowered” trials are not necessarily unethicalThe Lancet, 1997