Double-Blind Clinical Trials of Oral Cyclacillin and Ampicillin
Open Access
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 15 (1) , 55-58
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.15.1.55
Abstract
A double-blind study was performed to compare the clinical response and the incidence of side effects in 2,581 patients administered ampicillin or cyclacillin for infections of the genitourinary or respiratory tract, infections of the skin and soft tissues, or for otitis media. There was no significant difference in clinical response and bacterial eradication. All side effects, including diarrhea and skin rash, were approximately twice as frequent in patients treated with ampicillin.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- INCIDENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC‐RELATED DIARRHOEA AND PSEUDOMEMBRANOUS COLITIS A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF LINCOMYCIN, CLINDAMYCIN AND AMPICILLINThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1977
- [Effects and side-effects of ampicillin versus ciclacillin in a double blind randomized trial (author's transl)].1976
- Serum and Urinary Concentrations of Cyclacillin in HumansAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1973
- Adverse effects of orally administered ampicillinThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1973
- Ampicillin Hypersensitivity in Lymphatic LeukaemiaScottish Medical Journal, 1971
- Incidence of diarrhea in the treatment of genitourinary tract infections with ampicillin.1971
- Hypersensitivity Reactions to Ampicillin in Cytomegalovirus MononucleosisScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1970
- HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS TO ANTIBACTERIAL DRUGS IN INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSISThe Lancet, 1967
- The Aberdeen Typhoid Outbreak of 1964Scottish Medical Journal, 1965
- Comparison of Ampicillin and Chloramphenicol in Treatment of Paratyphoid FeverBMJ, 1964