Outcomes of Induced Labour
- 1 February 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 37 (1) , 16-19
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1997.tb02211.x
Abstract
We report a review of maternal and neonatal outcomes of labour in 1,405 pregnancies managed during a 12-month period. This included all singleton pregnancies of greater than 20 weeks' gestation, excluding women antenatally assigned for Caesarean delivery. Labour was induced in 313 cases (22.3%), and records were available for review in 311 of these. We classified the indications for induction according to the Australian Council of Healthcare Standards (ACHS)/RACOG list of 'defined' indications in Obstetric Clinical Indicator number 1. In 165 cases (53.7%) labour was induced for defined indications. There was no significant difference in the rates of instrumental vaginal delivery, Caesarean delivery or adverse neonatal outcome (admission to neonatal nursery in the first 24 hours of life; 5 minute Apgar score of < 7) between women who laboured spontaneously and those induced for 'nondefined' indications. However, labours induced for 'defined' indications had a significantly increased rate of these outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of Hypertension in Pregnancy: Executive SummaryThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1993
- Labour induction policy in hospitals of different levels of specialisationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: A retrospective study of complications and outcomeAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992
- The diagnosis of gestational diabetesThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1991
- Failed Induction of LabourAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- Hazards and benefits of elective induction of laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984