Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: A retrospective study of complications and outcome

Publisher Website

1 June 1992

journal article
Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Vol. 166 (6) , 1690-1697
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91558-r

Abstract

No abstract available

Keywords

This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:

Comparison of Induced Versus Non‐Induced Labor in Post‐Term Pregnancy: A Randomized Prospective Study
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1989
Programmed Induction of Labor for Primiparous Women to Ensure Daytime Delivery
Asia-Oceania Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987
Elective induction of labor: a prospective clinical study, I: Obstetric and neonatal effects
jpme, 1985
Hazards and benefits of elective induction of labor
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984
A prospective randomized study of induction of labor
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1983
The Labor Curve
Clinics in Perinatology, 1981
A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF INDUCTION OF LABOUR
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1979
SPONTANEOUS LABOR AND ELECTIVE INDUCTION—A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1979
A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF SELECTIVE PLANNED DELIVERY
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1978
ELECTIVE INDUCTION OF LABOUR
The Lancet, 1975