Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in the staging of Hodgkin's disease. Verification by laparotomy in 100 cases
- 15 October 1995
- Vol. 76 (8) , 1460-1466
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19951015)76:8<1460::aid-cncr2820760825>3.0.co;2-y
Abstract
Background. A staging laparotomy still is considered the gold standard to detect occult abdominal involvement in Hodgkin's disease. Computed tomography and ultrasound are routinely available for diagnostic imaging. To the authors' knowledge, the exact contribution of ultrasound for the staging of Hodgkin's disease has not been reported in a large series of patients before this study. Methods. The diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound was compared with that of computed tomography and laparotomy in 100 patients with biopsy-proven Hodgkin's disease. Liver, spleen, paraaortic, and iliac lymph nodes were evaluated separately. Results. Seventeen patients had a higher disease stage after surgery (17%). Considering only patients without known abdominal disease (supradiaphragmatic involvement), 14/79 (18%) had a positive staging laparotomy. Ultrasound had superior sensitivity for detecting splenic involvement with Hodgkin's disease (sensitivity, 63% compared with 37% for computed tomography). The specificity of both methods for detecting splenic disease was identical (99% vs. 96%). Inhomogeneities of structure or small nodular infiltrates were detected preferentially by ultrasound. Hepatic involvement also was visualized better by ultrasound than by computed tomography. Lymph nodes at the splenic hilus were recognized by both methods with identical sensitivity (64% vs. 62%). Paraaortic and iliac lymph nodes were recognized with greater sensitivity by computed tomography than by ultrasound (sensitivity, 93% and 100% vs. 77% and 67%, respectively). Conclusions. These results indicate that ultrasound and computed tomography each have their weaknesses and strengths and therefore should be combined, if possible. Ultrasound is the fastest and least invasive method and has particular accuracy for detecting splenic involvement, whereas computed tomography is more accurate in detecting involvement of paraaortic or iliac lymph node. If cost is important in the staging of Hodgkin's disease and if computed tomography is considered the standard, patients whose results are negative by computed tomography should be examined by ultrasound, focusing on splenic texture and size. Even in the era of combined modality treatment, surgical staging may be necessary to detect occult abdominal disease in a certain number of cases.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultrasound diagnosis of splenic lymphoma: ROC analysis of multidimensional splenic indicesThe British Journal of Radiology, 1993
- Splenectomy and the increasing risk of secondary acute leukemia in Hodgkin's disease.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1993
- Diagnostic imaging studies in patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's diseaseAnnals of Oncology, 1992
- Hodgkin's DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Ultrasonography of spleen and liver in staging Hodgkin's diseaseEuropean Journal of Radiology, 1991
- Ultrasonographic patterns of focal hepatic and splenic lesions in Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomaThe British Journal of Radiology, 1987
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Chest Radiography, Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography in Malignant LymphomaActa Radiologica, 1987
- Spleen structure in Hodgkin disease: ultrasonic characterization. Work in progress.Radiology, 1984
- Computed tomography, lymphography, and staging laparotomy: correlations in initial staging of Hodgkin diseaseAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1984
- SURGICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS OF LAPAROTOMY AND SPLENECTOMY IN HODGKIN’S DISEASEAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1973