Cytohistologic Discrepancies
Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 117 (4) , 567-573
- https://doi.org/10.1309/j6jm-2741-hm34-1f1e
Abstract
The use of cytohistologic discrepancies to investigate and reduce error seldom is studied. All gynecologic discrepancies (n = 283; 0.87% and 7.37% ofKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interobserver Reproducibility of Cervical Cytologic and Histologic InterpretationsRealistic Estimates From the ASCUS-LSIL Triage StudyJAMA, 2001
- What Levels of Agreement Can Be Expected Between Histopathologists Assigning Cases to Discrete Nominal Categories? A Study of the Diagnosis of Hyperplastic and Adenomatous Colorectal PolypsLaboratory Investigation, 2000
- Physician education and report cards: do they make the grade? Results from a randomized controlled trialThe American Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Personal performance profiles: a useful adjunct to quality assurance in cervical cyt_logyCytopathology, 1998
- Aberrant Diagnoses by Individual Surgical PathologistsThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1998
- Quality Assessment and Tracking Results of Cardiac SurgeryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- Performance measurement in prostate cancer care: Beyond report cardsUrology, 1996
- Report Cards on Cardiac Surgeons — Assessing New York State's ApproachNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Cytologic/Histologic Correlation for Quality Control in Cervicovaginal Cytology:Experience With 1,582 Paired CasesAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1995
- Quality-assurance study of simultaneously sampled, non-correlating cervical cytology and biopsiesDiagnostic Cytopathology, 1993