Biodiversity Assessment and Conservation Strategies
- 27 March 1998
- journal article
- other
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 279 (5359) , 2106-2108
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5359.2106
Abstract
The efficient representation of all species in conservation planning is problematic. Often, species distribution is assessed by dividing the land into a grid; complementary sets of grids, in which each taxon is represented at least once, are then sought. To determine if this approach provides useful surrogate information, species and higher taxon data for South African plants and animals were analyzed. Complementary species sets did not coincide and overlapped little with higher taxon sets. Survey extent and taxonomic knowledge did not affect this overlap. Thus, the assumptions of surrogacy, on which so much conservation planning is based, are not supported.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Species richness covariance in higher taxa: empirical tests of the biodiversity indicator conceptEcography, 1997
- Survey research in conservation biologyEcography, 1996
- Biodiversity - congruenceProgress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 1996
- Os diálogos da identidade no fim do séculoTesserae, 1994
- Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversityPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1994
- Measuring more of biodiversity: Can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness?Biological Conservation, 1994
- Hotspots and species diversityNature, 1994
- An upgraded reserve selection algorithmBiological Conservation, 1993
- Regional Numbers of Insect and Plant SpeciesFunctional Ecology, 1992
- Ecological Uses of Vertebrate Indicator Species: A CritiqueConservation Biology, 1988