Defining the field of literature in action research: a personal approach
Open Access
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Action Research
- Vol. 7 (1) , 105-124
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799900200077
Abstract
I am currently engaged in research aimed at improving my practice as a supervisor of practitioner action research projects. The exploration of my developing practice has involved me in exploring both my role as a supervisor and my learning as a supervisee. Questions emerging from my work include: What is the body of literature in which my work is to be located? Why is its identification problematic? In writing up my research, I want to re-define the field of literature in terms of that literature which has really engaged me and challenged my thinking rather than in terms of the literature which merely exists within some pre-defined field. I would also want to argue that this conception of the literature fits the kind of model of action research which demands that we show a willingness to step outside our usual frames of reference, that we question our habitual ways of seeing and that we constantly seek out fresh perspectives on the familiar.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Can She Know?Published by Cornell University Press ,2019
- Hermeneutics and the Human SciencesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2016
- What counts as ‘better’ practice? supporting students in improving their practice by drawing out the value dimensionsEducational Action Research, 1997
- Contingency, Irony, and SolidarityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1989
- Anarchic ThinkingHypatia, 1988
- Research as PraxisHarvard Educational Review, 1986