A Comparison of Steady-State ARIES and Pulsed PULSAR Tokamak Power Plants
- 1 November 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Fusion Technology
- Vol. 26 (3P2) , 1163-1168
- https://doi.org/10.13182/fst94-a40311
Abstract
The multi-institutional ARIES team has completed a series of four steady-state and two pulsed cost-optimized conceptual designs of commercial tokamak fusion power plants. The level of assumed advances in technology and physics was varied from one design to the next. The cost benefits of various design options are compared quantitatively with an emphasis placed on pulsed versus steady-state operation. Possible means to improve the economic competitiveness of fusion are suggested.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Updated Comparison of Economics of Fusion Reactors With Advanced Fission ReactorsFusion Technology, 1991
- Reversed field pinch ignition requirementsNuclear Fusion, 1991
- A comparison of pulsed and steady-state tokamak reactor burn cycles. Part I: Thermal effects and lifetime limitationsNuclear Engineering and Design. Fusion, 1985