Employee attitudes and job satisfaction
Top Cited Papers
- 17 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Human Resource Management
- Vol. 43 (4) , 395-407
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20032
Abstract
This article identifies three major gaps between HR practice and the scientific research in the area of employee attitudes in general and the most focal employee attitude in particular—job satisfaction: (1) the causes of employee attitudes, (2) the results of positive or negative job satisfaction, and (3) how to measure and influence employee attitudes. Suggestions for practitioners are provided on how to close the gaps in knowledge and for evaluating implemented practices. Future research will likely focus on greater understanding of personal characteristics, such as emotion, in defining job satisfaction and how employee attitudes influence organizational performance. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.American Psychologist, 2002
- The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.Psychological Bulletin, 2001
- Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997
- A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW OF ATTITUDINAL AND DISPOSITIONAL PREDICTORS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORPersonnel Psychology, 1995
- Job Satisfaction as a Reflection of Disposition: A Multiple Source Causal AnalysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993
- A Restatement of the Satisfaction-Performance HypothesisJournal of Management, 1988
- A reevaluation of the absenteeism-job satisfaction relationshipOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985
- Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1985
- Job preferences (What makes a job good or bad?).Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- An index of job satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1951