Improvement in Sensitivity of Screening Mammography with Computer-Aided Detection:A Multiinstitutional Trial
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 181 (3) , 687-693
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810687
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Our study evaluated radiologist detection of breast cancer using a computer-aided detection system.MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three radiologists reviewed 377 screening mammograms interpreted as showing normal or benign findings 9-24 months before cancer diagnosis from 17 of the 18 participating centers. In 313 cases, study radiologists recommended additional mammographic evaluation. In 177 cases, the area warranting additional workup precisely correlated with the subsequently diagnosed cancer. These 177 missed cancers were evaluated with computer-aided detection. The proportion of radiologists identifying the missed cancers was used to determine radiologist sensitivity without computer-aided detection.RESULTS. The study radiologists determined that 123 of the 377 missed cancer cases warranted workup. Therefore, 123 additional cancers cases could have been found. The calculated radiologist sensitivity without computer-aided detection was therefore 75.4% (377 / [377 + 123]). Similarly, using the perf...Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radiologist Detection of Microcalcifications With and Without Computer-Aided Detection: A Comparative StudyClinical Radiology, 2001
- DOUBLE READINGRadiologic Clinics of North America, 2000
- Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammographyAcademic Radiology, 1996
- Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammogramsBMJ, 1996
- Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experienceThe British Journal of Radiology, 1995
- The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screeningClinical Radiology, 1994
- Double reading of mammography screening films-one radiologist or two?Clinical Radiology, 1993
- Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- The Lifetime Risk of Developing Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- The Role of the Reference Radiologist; Estimates of Inter-Observer Agreement and Potential Delay in Cancer Detection in the National Breast Screening StudyInvestigative Radiology, 1990