Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography
- 1 November 1996
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Academic Radiology
- Vol. 3 (11) , 891-897
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1076-6332(96)80296-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sampleArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- What are the issues in the double reading of mammograms?Radiology, 1994
- Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program.Radiology, 1994
- Mammography ScreeningActa Radiologica, 1994
- Double reading of mammography screening films-one radiologist or two?Clinical Radiology, 1993
- Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer: First Year Results from Helsinki and SurroundingsAnnals of Medicine, 1989
- Biases in the assessment of diagnostic testsStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical AccuracyStatistical Science, 1986
- Improving Performance by Multiple Interpretations of Chest Radiographs: Effectiveness and CostRadiology, 1978
- The value of consultation among radiologistsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1976