WHAT HAPPENS AFTER SUCCESS: THE PERILS OF EXCELLENCE*
- 5 May 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Management Studies
- Vol. 31 (3) , 325-358
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00621.x
Abstract
This article examines how past performance influences the way an organization evolves, makes decisions, and adapts to its environment. It argues that compared to other periods of history, those that follow a lengthy interval of success will reveal companies that are especially apt to: (1) exhibit inertia in many aspects of structure and strategy‐making process; (2) pursue immoderation, that is, adopt extreme process orientations; (3) manifest inattention, that is, reduce intelligence gathering and information processing activity; and (4) demonstrate insularity by failing to adapt to changes in the environment. an empirical analysis of the long‐term histories of 36 companies provides tentative support for these notions.This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of actionPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Accounting control systems and business strategy: An empirical analysisPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- THE SIMPLICITY OF COMPETITIVE REPERTOIRES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS.Academy of Management Proceedings, 1993
- Dynamics of Publisher Succession in Newspaper OrganizationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1984
- The Justification of Organizational PerformanceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural PersistenceAmerican Sociological Review, 1977
- Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and CeremonyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- The Population Ecology of OrganizationsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?Psychological Bulletin, 1975