Mortality Estimation: Biased Results from Unbiased Ages
- 1 December 1984
- journal article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Vol. 41 (12) , 1843-1847
- https://doi.org/10.1139/f84-227
Abstract
Estimates of mortality rates from age distributions are biased by imprecision in age estimation, even if age estimates are unbiased. I have derived a method for predicting the magnitude of this bias from information on the precision of age determination. Monte Carlo simulations show that bias can be accurately predicted. The commonly used Chapman–Robson mortality estimator is shown to be robust to imprecision in age determination if all age-classes are included. Errors are likely, however, if one or more age-classes are excluded or if other mortality estimators are used. Biases can be corrected if the distribution of age-estimation errors is known.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Statistical Method for Evaluating the Reproducibility of Age DeterminationCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1982
- A Method for Comparing the Precision of a Set of Age DeterminationsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1981
- Habitat Utilization, Competitive Interactions, and Coexistence of three Species of Cricetine Rodents in East‐Central ArizonaEcology, 1979
- Mortality Patterns in MammalsEcology, 1966
- Catch Curves and Mortality RatesTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1961
- The Analysis of a Catch CurveBiometrics, 1960
- Life Tables for Natural Populations of AnimalsThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1947