Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2 , but is it associated with more risk?
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 180 (6) , 1543-1550
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70050-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administrationObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervicesObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysisObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled TrialObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): Randomized comparisonAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: Progress and ChallengesClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995