The Manipulative Nature of Health Communication Research
- 1 November 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Behavioral Scientist
- Vol. 38 (2) , 285-293
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764294038002009
Abstract
Researchers and academics have accumulated a great deal of knowledge on how to manipulate individuals' behaviors. Although health communication researchers and practitioners prefer to call their work public health campaigns or health education interventions, the truth is that their ultimate goal is to manipulate people into practicing healthy behaviors. A health communication research and practice moves into the 21st century, this issue must be faced squarely and directly, and strategies must be developed for the ethical use of manipulation techniques to promote health and to prevent disease. The one fact I would cry from every housetop is this: the Good Life is waiting for us—here and now! At this very moment we have the necessary techniques, both material and psychological, to create a full and satisfying life for everyone. —B. F. Skinner Walden IIKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process modelCommunication Monographs, 1992
- On whether one can(not) not communicate: An examination via traditional communication postulatesWestern Journal of Speech Communication, 1990
- Perception of RiskScience, 1987
- Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safetyActa Psychologica, 1984
- The Health Belief Model: A Decade LaterHealth Education Quarterly, 1984
- On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative TherapiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 1977