Comparative study of three different membranes for guided bone regeneration of rat cranial defects
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
- Vol. 30 (1) , 58-62
- https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2000.0011
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The influence of cortical perforations and of space filling with peripheral blood on the kinetics Of guided bone generation. A comparative histometric study in the rat.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1999
- Effect of different microstructures of e‐PTFE membranes on bone regeneration and soft tissue response: a histologic study in canine mandibleClinical Oral Implants Research, 1999
- Histological morphology of the e‐FTFE/tissue interface in humans subjected to guided bone regeneration in conjunction with oral implant treatmentClinical Oral Implants Research, 1998
- Periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects with resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes: 30‐month resultsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1997
- Role of Type X Collagen on Experimental Mineralization of Eggshell MembranesConnective Tissue Research, 1997
- Resorption rates of 2 commercially available bioresorbable membranesJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1996
- Restoration of mandibular nonunion bone defects: An experimental study in rats using an osteopromotive membrane methodInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 1994
- An evaluation of bone healing in cavities in the jaws implanted with a collagen matrixBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1992
- Collagens of the Chicken Eggshell MembranesConnective Tissue Research, 1991
- Healing of Bone Defects by Guided Tissue RegenerationPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1988