A cost-effectiveness approach to the qualification and acceptance of biomarkers
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
- Vol. 5 (11) , 897-902
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2174
Abstract
The flow of new medicines to patients depends on the development of new biomarkers and their correct interpretation, yet there are no widely accepted and practically applicable criteria that facilitate adequate biomarker qualification. As a result, case-by-case qualifications are based on subjective assessments that do not lead to optimal decisions for patients, which have contributed to the 'stagnation' in drug productivity identified by the FDA. An alternative is to qualify biomarkers in terms of cost effectiveness using a set of principles that enable the evaluation of biomarkers even with incomplete knowledge. This approach could minimize harm to patients, improve access to medicines and reduce healthcare costs.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Drug-Related HepatotoxicityNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Risk Management in Post-Trust SocietiesPublished by Springer Nature ,2005
- Biomarkers and surrogate markers: An FDA perspectiveNeuroRX, 2004
- WHO evaluates NICEBMJ, 2003
- Fewer new drugs from the pharmaceutical industryBMJ, 2003
- A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk‐Based, Precaution‐Based, and Discourse‐Based Strategies1Risk Analysis, 2002
- Use of Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints in Drug Development and Regulatory Decision Making: Criteria, Validation, StrategiesAnnual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 2001
- Surrogate endpoints: A basis for a rational approachEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1992
- Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Definition and operational criteriaStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefitsPolicy Sciences, 1978