Performance Indicators Relating to Student Development: can they be trusted?
- 1 April 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Quality in Higher Education
- Vol. 4 (1) , 45-61
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832980040106
Abstract
Performance indicators are well‐established in the language of accountability in higher education, and are used to serve a variety of political and micro‐political ends. However, the speed of their implementation has not been matched by equivalent progress in the development of their technical qualities, particularly in the general area of the development of students. This article subjects a selection of student‐related indicators to analysis in terms of the interests they serve, their validity and their robustness (including their vulnerability to manipulation). In light of this analysis, some comments are made regarding the use of such indicators in policy arenas.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are UK degree standards going up, down or sideways?Studies in Higher Education, 1998
- Siamese Twins? Performance indicators in the service of accountability and enhancementQuality in Higher Education, 1995
- Variability of degree results in geography in United Kingdom universities 1973–90: Preliminary results and policy implicationsStudies in Higher Education, 1994
- A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience QuestionnaireStudies in Higher Education, 1991