Endotracheal Intubation, but Not Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion, Produces Reversible Bronchoconstriction
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 90 (2) , 391-394
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199902000-00010
Abstract
Background: Tracheal intubation frequently results in an increase in respiratory system resistance that can be reversed by inhaled bronchodilators. The authors hypothesized that insertion of a laryngeal mask airway would be less likely to result in reversible bronchoconstriction than would insertion of an endotracheal tube. Methods: Fifty-two (45 men, 7 women) patients were randomized to receive a 7.5-mm (women) or 8-mm (men) endotracheal tube or a No. 4 (women) or No. 5 (men) laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesia was induced with 2 microg/kg fentanyl and 5 mg/kg thiopental, and airway placement was facilitated with 1 mg/kg succinylcholine. When a seal to more than 20 cm water was verified, respiratory system resistance was measured immediately after airway placement. Inhalation anesthesia was begun with isoflurane to achieve an end-tidal concentration of 1% for 10 min. Respiratory system resistance was measured again during identical conditions. Results: Among patients receiving laryngeal mask airways, the initial respiratory system resistance was significantly less than among patients with endotracheal tubes (9.2+/-3.3 cm water x 1(-1) x s(-1) [mean +/- SD] compared with 13.4+/-9.6 cm water x 1(-1) x s(-1); P < 0.05). After 10 min of isoflurane, the resistance decreased to 8.6+/-3.6 cm water x 1(-1) x s(-1) in the endotracheal tube group but remained unchanged at 9.1+/-3.3 cm water x 1(-1) x s(-1) in the laryngeal mask airway group. The decrease in respiratory system resistance in the endotracheal tube group of 4.7+/-7 cm water x 1(-1) x s(-1) was highly significant compared with the lack of change in the laryngeal mask airway group (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Resistance decreased rapidly only in patients with endotracheal tubes after they received isoflurane, a potent bronchodilator, suggesting that reversible bronchoconstriction was present in patients with endotracheal tubes but not in those with laryngeal mask airways. A laryngeal mask airway is a better choice of airway to minimize airway reaction.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the Effects of Etomidate, Propofol, and Thiopental on Respiratory Resistance after Tracheal IntubationAnesthesiology, 1996
- Wheezing during Induction of General Anesthesia in Patients with and without AsthmaAnesthesiology, 1995
- Comparison Between Peak Expiratory Flow Rates (PEFR) and FEV1 in the Monitoring of Asthmatic Subjects at an Outpatient ClinicChest, 1994
- Effect of Prophylactic Bronchodilator Treatment on Lung Resistance after Tracheal IntubationAnesthesiology, 1994
- Resistance and additional inspiratory work imposed by the laryngeal mask airwayAnaesthesia, 1992
- THE LARYNGEAL MASK—A NEW CONCEPT IN AIRWAY MANAGEMENTBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1983
- Airway Reactivity in HumansAnesthesiology, 1983
- A comparison of some methods for measuring total respiratory resistance.Journal of Applied Physiology, 1974
- Reflex effects of upper airway irritation on total lung resistance and blood pressureJournal of Applied Physiology, 1962
- ANESTHESIA FOR THE ASTHMATIC PATIENTAnesthesiology, 1961